Xitoy va Oʻzbekiston tijorat huquqida iqtisodiy jinoyatlar tushunchasi va yuridik javobgarlikning qiyosiy-huquqiy tahlili
Kalit so'zlar:
iqtisodiy jinoyat; tijorat huquqi; qiyosiy huquq; yuridik javobgarlik; Xitoy; Oʻzbekiston; «Bir kamar — bir yoʻl» tashabbusi; yuridik shaxslarning jinoiy javobgarligi; tijoriy komplayens; UNCACAnnotatsiya
«Bir kamar — bir yoʻl» tashabbusi doirasida Xitoy va Oʻzbekiston oʻrtasidagi iqtisodiy aloqalarning chuqurlashuvi iqtisodiy jinoyatlar sohasidagi huquqiy moslikni tadbirkorlik subʼyektlari uchun amaliy masalaga aylantirdi. Maqolada Xitoy va Oʻzbekiston tijorat huquqida iqtisodiy jinoyatni belgilovchi tushunchalar, jinoyat turkumlari va javobgarlik rejimlari qiyoslanadi. Funksional qiyosiy huquq va normativ tahlil asosida koʻrsatiladiki, ikkala tizim oʻxshash vazifalarni bajaradi, biroq sezilarli darajada farqlanadi — ayniqsa yuridik shaxslarning jinoiy javobgarligi va jinoiy taʼqib uchun maʼmuriy shart boʻyicha, — shu bilan birga Korrupsiyaga qarshi BMT konvensiyasi va FATF standartlari doirasidagi umumiy majburiyatlar boʻyicha yaqinlashadi. Maqolada taʼkidlanadiki, maqsadli uygʻunlashtirish — yuridik shaxslarning jinoiy javobgarligi, parallel ish yuritishdan himoya va moliyaviy jinoyat chegaralari boʻyicha — davlatlarning siyosiy mustaqilligiga putur yetkazmasdan huquqiy ziddiyatlarni kamaytirishi mumkin.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar
1. Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (as amended up to 2022). (2022). Tashkent: Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
2. Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China (as amended for the eleventh time, 2021). (2021). Beijing: NPC Standing Committee.
3. Ergashev, B. (2021). Legal reform and economic governance in post-Soviet Central Asia: The Uzbekistan experience. Tashkent State Law University Press.
4. Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2023). Anti-money laundering and counterterrorist financing measures: Uzbekistan — fourth follow-up report. FATF/OECD.
5. Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2024). China: FATF mutual evaluation follow-up report. FATF/OECD.
6. Law on Competition of the Republic of Uzbekistan (2012, as amended 2022). (2022). Tashkent: Antimonopoly Committee of Uzbekistan.
7. Liebman, B. L. (2011). A populist threat to China's courts? In M. Y. K. Woo & M. E. Gallagher (Eds.), Chinese justice: Civil dispute resolution in contemporary China (pp. 269–313). Cambridge University Press.
8. People's Republic of China Anti-Monopoly Law (as amended 2022). (2022). Beijing: NPC Standing Committee.
9. People's Republic of China–Republic of Uzbekistan. (2024). Joint statement on the comprehensive strategic partnership for a new era. Beijing.
10. Posner, R. A. (2014). Economic analysis of law (9th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
11. SCO Secretariat. (2020). Convention of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation against terrorism, separatism and extremism: Implementation report. Shanghai Cooperation Organisation.
12. Sornarajah, M. (2021). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
13. Supreme People's Court & Supreme People's Procuratorate of the PRC (SPC & SPP). (2023). Interpretation on several issues concerning the application of law in handling criminal cases of economic crimes involving units. Beijing: SPC/SPP.
14. Trebilcock, M., & Howse, R. (2013). The regulation of international trade (4th ed.). Routledge.
15. United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). (2003). UN General Assembly Resolution 58/4, 31 October 2003, entered into force 14 December 2005. UN Treaty Series, Vol. 2349, p. 41.
16. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2024). UNCAC implementation and international cooperation in asset recovery: Central Asia focus. UNODC.
17. Wachtel, A. (2018). Rewriting Uzbekistan: Law, power and reform under Mirziyoyev. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute.
18. Yusupov, A. (2020). Anti-corruption enforcement and private sector compliance in Uzbekistan: Post-2017 developments. Eurasian Law Journal, 13(2), 112–128.
