A Comparative Analysis of the Concept of Economic Crimes and Legal Liability in the Commercial Law of China and Uzbekistan
Keywords:
economic crime; commercial law; comparative law; legal liability; China; Uzbekistan; Belt and Road Initiative; corporate criminal liability; commercial compliance; UNCACAbstract
Under the Belt and Road Initiative, deepening economic ties between China and Uzbekistan have made legal compatibility in the field of economic crime a practical concern for commercial actors. This article compares the conceptual definitions, offence typologies and liability regimes governing economic crime in the commercial law of China and Uzbekistan. Using functionalist comparative law and normative analysis, it shows that the two systems perform equivalent functions but diverge significantly — most notably in corporate criminal liability and in the administrative precondition for criminal prosecution — while converging under shared obligations to the United Nations Convention against Corruption and the FATF standards. It argues that targeted harmonisation — in corporate criminal liability, protection against concurrent proceedings, and financial-crime thresholds — can reduce regulatory friction without sacrificing either state's policy autonomy.
References
1. Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan (as amended up to 2022). (2022). Tashkent: Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
2. Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China (as amended for the eleventh time, 2021). (2021). Beijing: NPC Standing Committee.
3. Ergashev, B. (2021). Legal reform and economic governance in post-Soviet Central Asia: The Uzbekistan experience. Tashkent State Law University Press.
4. Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2023). Anti-money laundering and counterterrorist financing measures: Uzbekistan — fourth follow-up report. FATF/OECD.
5. Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2024). China: FATF mutual evaluation follow-up report. FATF/OECD.
6. Law on Competition of the Republic of Uzbekistan (2012, as amended 2022). (2022). Tashkent: Antimonopoly Committee of Uzbekistan.
7. Liebman, B. L. (2011). A populist threat to China's courts? In M. Y. K. Woo & M. E. Gallagher (Eds.), Chinese justice: Civil dispute resolution in contemporary China (pp. 269–313). Cambridge University Press.
8. People's Republic of China Anti-Monopoly Law (as amended 2022). (2022). Beijing: NPC Standing Committee.
9. People's Republic of China–Republic of Uzbekistan. (2024). Joint statement on the comprehensive strategic partnership for a new era. Beijing.
10. Posner, R. A. (2014). Economic analysis of law (9th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
11. SCO Secretariat. (2020). Convention of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation against terrorism, separatism and extremism: Implementation report. Shanghai Cooperation Organisation.
12. Sornarajah, M. (2021). The international law on foreign investment (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
13. Supreme People's Court & Supreme People's Procuratorate of the PRC (SPC & SPP). (2023). Interpretation on several issues concerning the application of law in handling criminal cases of economic crimes involving units. Beijing: SPC/SPP.
14. Trebilcock, M., & Howse, R. (2013). The regulation of international trade (4th ed.). Routledge.
15. United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). (2003). UN General Assembly Resolution 58/4, 31 October 2003, entered into force 14 December 2005. UN Treaty Series, Vol. 2349, p. 41.
16. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2024). UNCAC implementation and international cooperation in asset recovery: Central Asia focus. UNODC.
17. Wachtel, A. (2018). Rewriting Uzbekistan: Law, power and reform under Mirziyoyev. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute.
18. Yusupov, A. (2020). Anti-corruption enforcement and private sector compliance in Uzbekistan: Post-2017 developments. Eurasian Law Journal, 13(2), 112–128.
