Theoretical Foundations of Legal Strategic Decision-Making in Government Bodies in Uzbekistan and China
Keywords:
legal strategic decision-making, rule of law, public governance, institutional environment, decision-making mechanisms, governance modernization, procedural justice, legitimacyAbstract
Legal strategic decision-making constitutes a critical mechanism in modern governance, bridging national strategic objectives with the rule of law. This study systematically examines the theoretical foundations, institutional frameworks, and operational characteristics of legal strategic decision-making. The concept is defined as systematic, forward-looking decisions made by states concerning major issues affecting economic and social development, public interests, and long-term national objectives, formulated through institutionalized procedures within the boundaries of law. The theoretical analysis reveals that legal strategic decision-making is underpinned by two complementary theoretical pillars: public governance theory, which emphasizes multi-actor participation, transparency, and deliberative processes; and rule-of-law theory, which provides institutional constraints and legitimacy through constitutional principles, procedural justice, and the supremacy of law. Furthermore, the study explores the dynamic and interactive relationship between decision-making mechanisms and the institutional environment. The institutional environment—comprising formal and informal rules, norms, and arrangements within political, legal, economic, and social spheres—determines the allocation of authority, procedural design, and resource distribution. Conversely, major legal strategic decisions can drive institutional reform and governance restructuring. The integration of governance and rule-of-law perspectives enhances decision-making scientific rigor, democratic legitimacy, and institutional authority. This study contributes to understanding how legal strategic decision-making can be optimized to advance the modernization of national governance systems and governance capacity.
References
1. Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. http://www.jstor.org/stable/977437
2. Georg Jellinek. (1905). System der subjektiven öffentlichen Rechte (2nd rev. ed.). Archive.org. https://archive.org/details/systemdersubjekt00jell
3. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press.
4. Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 319.
5. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
6. Ullmann, W. (2010). Principles of government and politics in the Middle Ages (Routledge Revivals ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203855683
7. Weber, M. (1921). Politics as a vocation. In P. Lassman & R. Speirs (Eds.), Political writings (pp. 309–369). Cambridge University Press.
8. Xi, J. P. (习近平). (2020). 论坚持全面依法治国 [On upholding comprehensive lawbased governance]. Central Party Literature Press.
9. Yu, K. P. (俞可平). (2000). 《治理与善治》 [Governance and good governance]. Social Sciences Academic Press.
10. Zhang, W. X. (张文显). (2017). 《法治与国家治理现代化》 [Rule of law and modernization of state governance]. China Renmin University Press.
